General Grading Policy | Common
Exam Errors
Written
Assignment Evaluation Form | How to Write Essays | Common Essay Errors
General Grading Policy for Prof. Pavlac
This page should help you better understand how your instructor determines your grade.
You, the student, earn your grade through your work in this course. The instructor evaluates your work according to how well it meets class objectives,
fulfills requirements, and reflects academic skills expected of college students ( whether general
history classes or advanced levels for History Majors).
Any and all students could earn an "A" on any assignment or for the course.
There is no grading curve.
While grading can be imprecise, the instructor tries to grade assignments according to
specific criteria. Read the syllabus carefully for those criteria concerning
each
assignment. The instructor also requires cover pages to assignments to help
him grade "blindly" without bias or favoritism.
It is your responsibility to understand why you have achieved a certain
grade, and what steps you can take to maintain or improve your grade.
You are encouraged to consult with the instructor, by email: , telephone (570-208-4900, ext. 5748), voicemail
messages, or personal visits
(Hafey-Marian 307) during office hours or by appointment, both before and after exams and
written assignments.
The following general guidelines indicate what kind of work will earn a specific grade.
Work of poor quality deserves a D or even an F:
failing to turn in written work, tardiness, not participating in classroom activity,
making serious errors of facts, and/or writing incomplete and superficial essays and exam
answers which do not explain historical facts and concepts.
Work of an average quality gets a C:
promptly turning in adequate written work, regularly participating in classroom activity,
making few errors of facts, and/or writing complete and competent essays and exam answers
which reasonably explain historical facts and concepts.
Work of good quality rates a B:
promptly turning in well-thought out written work, usually participating in classroom
activity, making no more than a few insignificant errors of facts, and/or writing thorough
and interesting essays and exam answers which substantially explain historical facts and
concepts.
Work of superior quality merits an A:
promptly turning in written work that shows extraordinary effort or skill, often contributing
positively to
classroom activity, making almost no errors of facts, and/or writing comprehensive and
thought-provoking essays and exam answers which thoroughly explain historical facts and
concepts.
For your protection, in case of errors of recording marks, you should keep copies of all exams and assignments until you have received official notice of your final grade.
General Grading Policy | Common
Exam Errors
Written
Assignment Evaluation Form | Common Essay Errors
Common Exam Errors
Map Questions:
- misplacement of desired location
- misunderstanding of question
- insufficient study of map locations
Short Identifications :
- lack of specific enough date or incorrect date
- absent place/geographic location for the term
- inadequate explanation of term
- insufficient explanation of its historical significance: why the term is important. How does it affect us today; how did it affect people in the past?
- answering the incorrect number of identifications
Exam Essays:
- lack of introduction or conclusion
- incoherent paragraphs
- insufficient proper names, dates, and details
- missing a topic/section of relevant information
- inadequate depth of information
- misunderstanding of question
- written like an outline
Assessment of Written Assignments
It is up to the writer to make his or her writing suitable for the reader. Here are two similes for thinking about writing::
1. Reading is like going on a trip. The introduction is the brochure that tells you where you are going (your thesis), and basically what you will be seeing along the way (your points). The paragraphs are the important stops, like a church, a castle, and a museum. Each paragraph describes each place in detail, but also connects it to the theme of the larger trip. Bad writing is like bumps on the road, interfering with the pleasure of travel. Changing the subject or including irrelevant points are like detours--distractions from the main journey. Jumping to conclusions will only get the reader lost. A conclusion sums up where one has been. After a successful trip, the reader is then left to reflect on the importance this trip has had for herself.
2. Reading is like eating a meal. The introduction is the menu that lays out the courses. The eater then knows what to expect and anticipate. Each course is a paragraph, filling out the taste and design of each dish. Courses out of order are like badly organized paragraphs -- confusing and distracting. Bad writing is like badly cooked food--underdone or burnt with carelessness. Well-chosen words and bright ideas are unexpected delights of spices or flavors. A fine meal, like fine writing, results in a happy and satisfied customer (perhaps wanting more). A bad meal, like bad writing, leaves the customer disappointed and with a belly ache.
Grading is merely a formal evaluation of that reading process. Assessment provides feedback on how well an assignment has met the required goals set by the instructor.
The instructor will use the following marks throughout your paper. You should use these to become aware of possible improvements in your writing.
= Here is a good fact, detail or point. The more of these the better. | |
= You have an amazing or interesting point. | |
= You have misspelled this word, improperly capitalized it, or misused an apostrophe. | |
= Your meaning is unclear. Either I do not understand, or your sense is ambiguous. | |
= This statement is factually wrong. Check your sources. | |
= Is this comment necessary? Omitting it might make your essay more concise. | |
= It is unclear how this remark is relevant to your argument. | |
= You contradict yourself. Compare this statement to what you have written elsewhere. | |
= This statement is repetitive. | |
= Your writing here is awkward, because of a grammatical error or an imprecise style. | |
= You should delete this word, space or punctuation mark. | |
= Your language is too wordy. Be concise. | |
= Wrong word: I think you use this word incorrectly; another choice might better express your intent. | |
= You exaggerate. Be more modest or realistic in your description. | |
= You are using colloquial language or slang. You should be more formal. | |
= This verb is in error. For example, check for subject-verb agreement or proper tense. | |
= You should insert the appropriate punctuation mark. | |
= Here is a fragment, not a complete thought. You need to write a complete sentence. | |
= You need a better transition between two sentences or between two paragraphs to show either their connection and continuity or a change in the direction of your argument. | |
= This sign indicates a paragraph problem. Your paragraph may lack a coherent topic sentence or overall unity. | |
= This passage should be single spaced. Is it a citation, or a quote longer than three lines? |
The instructor will use the following chart to grade some of your written
assignments,
based on his evaluation of how well you follow the instructions as to presentation,
content and quality of writing.
You should use these evaluation criteria as a self-assessment guide while you complete
assignments and for improvement on later ones. For more information, consult your
printed syllabus, the paper presentation guide,
and information below.
Grade: | A | B | C | D | F |
Thesis: | |||||
introduction: | |||||
conclusion: | |||||
Organization: | |||||
¶ structure: | |||||
Evidence: | |||||
use of details: | |||||
source citation: | |||||
Presentation: | |||||
citation format: |
Some Strengths: neatly presented; correct length; imaginative; effective tone; shows effort;
you seem to understand the basic material; good examples; good ideas
Some Weaknesses: slang; clichés; contractions; spelling errors; apostrophe errors; quotes;
sentences errors (fragments, run-ons); wrong format for
citations or Bibliography;
introduction does not present plan or purpose; conclusion lacks summary
Some Suggestions for Improvement: write with more formal diction; use the past tense;
use the active voice more; proofread; do more research; provide more details;
explain points in more depth; focus more on your thesis;
with this paper, please see me as soon as possible during office hours or by appointment
How to Write Essays (Further explanation of the above form)
Make sure your paper has a thesis statement: one sentence that concisely presents your argument. Avoid repeating the wording in the syllabus used to describe your paper's purpose. Take a stand, show a direction with a thesis. You are not simply presenting a report, but trying to argue a point of view. Clearly present your thesis in both your introduction and conclusion, explicitly listing as well the kind of information you use to support it. For more on theses, click here.
The introduction of your paper is important. A stranger should be able to read it and know what the assignment is about, and how you, specifically, are going to deal with it. Your first paragraph, the introduction, should start with an exordium, a general lead in to the topic. You should introduce the topic clearly, and focus it with your thesis statement. You should also describe how, with what main points (usually the key ideas of your paragraphs), you will develop your argument.
These key ideas should be reemphasized in your conclusion. Especially in short essays of 4-7 pages, the introduction should only be one paragraph long. Beware of breaking it up into several paragraphs.
Your paper needs a clear organization in order for the instructor to easily read and readily evaluate your ideas. As mentioned above, you should indicate your general organization in the introduction and again review your key points again in the conclusion. In historical papers, it is common to use a chronological sequence to organize your ideas. But a thematic approach may be more useful. Whichever structure, or combination thereof, you use, inform the reader in your introduction. See the simile above of taking the reader on a trip.
Make sure you have solid paragraphs. Each paragraph should have a topic sentence, usually the first one, which clearly defines the subject of that paragraph. Each paragraph should be one significant argument for your thesis. Only information pertinent to that subject should be included in that paragraph. Further, specific details and generalizations should show some sort of structure or flow. And transitions, whether single words, short phrases, or a full sentence, should connect ideas both within and between paragraphs in any essay.
Your use of evidence is key to showing the quality of research and defending your thesis. Details are specific piece of information drawn from your sources. Every piece of information used should provide context or contribute to supporting your paper's purpose. Other information is irrelevant, and should be left out. Be sure to adequately describe or define any historical people, institutions or events that you mention. Go into detail for those that help develop your argument.
Be sure to use a wide variety of sources in order to be
well-informed about the paper's topic. Especially do not use one source
too much on any one page; instead select information from several books or
articles. Cite any information that is not general
knowledge, even when you use your own words. If you are allowed to quote, each one must also be cited.
Citations help the reader understand where you got the information from to make
your argument, and help the reader to find that information for
himself.
For more information, on citations, click here.
A smooth style is likewise important. Even though this class is not an "English" or a "writing" course, proper communication always counts. Complete sentences should have both a subject and a verb. Carefully consider your choice of words. They should reflect the proper tone (usually formal) and properly describe the concept or action which you are trying to explain.
A formal style includes several components. You should write as if you are addressing a respected adult. So avoid colloquial (familiar) language, especially common slang, but do not get too high-falutin', fancy, or flowery with your writing either. Your words should genuinely come from you. Write in the third person. Do not use the first person ("I", "me"). You should leave out references to your own self or person (such as with "I feel..."). Do not involve yourself in the paper -- be objective. Unlike this commentary, do not use the second person ("you"), addressing the reader (e.g."You are probably wondering..." or "As you know..."). Avoid rhetorical questions. Do not use contractions (such as "don't;" spell it out, as in "do not"). Always use last or family names of people you discuss -- you are not on a first name basis with any figures of history (unless they only have a first name).
Finally the presentation of your paper should conform to specific requirements. See paper presentation guide, here. This includes the formatting of citations and bibliography. For more on citations, click here.
General Grading Policy | Common
Exam Errors
Written
Assignment Evaluation Form | How to Write Essays |
Common Essay Errors
Common Essay/Written Assignment Errors (click here for a convenient checklist)
Try to avoid these mistakes which students make too often:
Format (not following guidelines listed in the syllabus, handouts or the paper presentation guide) has:
- too large margins.
- too large typeface/font or not properly double-spacing (except for citations and bibliography).
- too faint ink/non-black ink.
- no title page.
- insufficient info on title page (e.g. no class section/time).
- no staple.
- no page numbers (or in incorrect location). Every page, except the title page, should have its appropriate number in the upper right corner.
- smudges, stains, tears, folds on paper.
- headings or sub-headings.
- extra spaces between paragraphs (more than just standard double-spacing).
- no underlining/italicizing for titles (of books, journals or movies) or foreign words.
- "titles of articles" without quotation marks.
- a citation format other than Chicago Manual of Style/Turabian footnote/bibliography guidelines (no superscripted numbers; incorrect punctuation; insufficient data). Be sure to end citations with a period.
Introduction:
- begins paper with "The topic I have chosen...," "In this paper I will ...," or something similar. Such phrases are trite and repetitive. Likewise poor is to begin a paragraph in a biography with "She was born...." As a topic sentence such would imply the entire paragraph is about the person's birth, whereas usually it is about the person's early years.
- jumps abruptly into topic.
- does not present clear thesis statement in one sentence.
- does not outline plan or structure.
- has more than one introductory paragraph.
- lacks transition from introduction to first content paragraph.
General Style has:
- inadequate or absent topic sentences.
- overuse of rhetorical or actual questions.
- misuse of homonyms (e.g. to/too/two, their/there, weather/whether, throne/thrown, know/no, sight/cite/site, marry/merry/Mary). Spell checkers will not catch these.
- contractions (e.g. doesn't, isn't).
- beware of homonyms, esp. "site," "cite," and "sight."
- the dreaded it's: This is doubly dastardly: "it's" is actually a contraction of "it is," and therefore it is forbidden in a formal style. Yet people often mistakenly use it's as the possessive form of "it." Such is incorrect: the proper possessive form of "it" is "its" (with no apostrophe, similar to his or hers).
Content, where the writer:
- claims that "History states...." "History" is not a person. Historians research and write up the information for history papers. You should provide their names.
- does not cite enough sources. Especially, every time you write something like "Historians describe/say/believe/state/assert, etc." you need a source! Cite the documents which or historian(s) who provided your information.
- asserts fact for opinion, especially when unsupported by source citation. How does the instructor know that YOU really know specific historical material, unless you cite it?
- fails to properly cite quote, opinion, or information not of common knowledge. This is plagiarism. For more on plagiarism, click here.
- lacks clear thesis statement or argument.
- uses no description of main points used in argument.
- confuses minor issues with major ones. Don't overemphasize insignificant points as if they were important ones.
- uses unnecessary content notes: in a short student papers notes should refer to sources, and not have close, detailed explanations.
- includes no summary or conclusion.
- does not consult enough sources (such as tertiary sources (encyclopedias and handbooks) instead of secondary sources (specific books and articles by professional historians)).
Citations have:
- no period at end of note.
- too much information or multiple references drawn from the same source. On second citations from the same source, only the author's last name and page number is usually necessary.
- no citation of what is not general knowledge, especially quotes and statistics.
- ibid., op.cit. or other no-longer-used Latin abbreviations.
- unnecessary spaces between footnotes.
- incorrect indentation or gaps between number and first word.
- punctuation not appropriate to Chicago Manual of Style/Turabian format.
Bibliography:
- is not on last page.
- is not arranged alphabetically by author's last name (do not number them).
- is not single spaced.
- is not properly indented (hanging indent in bibliography).
- lacks sufficient number of sources.
- contains the wrong kinds of sources (consider primary, secondary, tertiary or printed vs. internet, as instructed) or lack of variety in them.
- does not provide enough information (e.g. places, dates).
- has punctuation not appropriate to Chicago Manual of Style/Turabian format.
General Grading Policy | Common
Exam Errors
Written
Assignment Evaluation Form | How to Write Essays |
Common Essay Errors
These pages may be printed and used, |
URL: http://brianpavlac.org/teach/thEvaluation.html |